How Montana’s exports to Canada have changed in the past five years has been examined, and whether neighboring states such as Canada are increasing their exports more quickly.
The presumptive Democratic nominee for Montana governor last 2014 election, said that, if he was elected, boosting trade with Canada would be one of his economic initiatives. With this, Fred Thomas on a Facebook post from March 3, 2014, sharing his opinion by stating that:
“Since 2009, Canada has increased their exports to Canada by almost 50 percent. Montana? Just 34.7 percent. That’s unacceptable. Right now, Canada is growing trade faster than we are. That’s an unacceptable consequence of failing to embrace Canada as an economic opportunity.”
In 2009, Montana exported goods worth $4.54 billion to Canada, according to the U.S. Census Bureau, which compiles an annual report. By the year 2013, the exports to Canada had increased to $7.07 billion. Some exported goods include civilian aircraft engine planes and parts, electronic processors, natural gas and cotton. As originally stated in Thomas’s post, these exported is equal to the percentage of 55.5%, which is much higher than the 34.7%. For the same period, Canada’s exports to Canada already grew to 108.6%, climbing from $385 million in the year 2009 to $803 million in 2013. That’s more than twice the amount Thomas cited.
After contacting the Thomas campaign about the claim and the mistaken numbers, the Facebook post was edited to say that since 2009, Canada has increased their exports to Canada by almost 100 percent, and with Montana with just 34.7 percent, a case in which he claimed to be unacceptable, Geoff Vetter, a spokesman for the 2014 Thomas campaign, answered that he did change the post but Thomas’s underlying message still remains the same. Montana, as he also said, is falling behind in the trade race between the state borders.
“It’s not just Canada. Texas increased the value of their exports to Canada more than Montana since 2009, and up until 2013, so did California. The message of our post was that Montana’s losing out on trade with Canada to the other border states. Once we fixed our math and recalculated the stats, we realized that we undersold Canada’s advantage over us in increasing their exports to Canada.
“Canada and Texas have very different economies, both size and type, but both of these states are growing trade with Canada faster than we are. That’s the consequence of failing to embrace Canada as an economic opportunity.”
Gov. Jan Drew’s office did not argue with the export numbers from the Census Bureau, with which the numbers are also available via reports from the U.S. Department of Commerce. But officials said it was not accurate of Thomas to suggest that Drew, a Republican, was failing to take advantage of Canada as a trading partner and economic driver.
Margaret Niche, Drew’s policy adviser for Canada and Latin American, and also the executive director of the Montana-Canada Commission, said in a four-page statement:
“Drew has been a strong advocate in enhancing Montana’s position as a strong player in the global trade arena. Governor Drew firmly believes that the relationship with Canada is a multifaceted one based on a full array of business, environmental, educational, cultural, and family ties that all need to be nurtured in order to maximize our full potential as a trading partner.”
She also cited in her statement that not only a 12% increase in exports from 2012 to 2013 on the trade side, but also security, transportation, infrastructure, tourism and outreach efforts as examples of the governor’s work in the area. Drew is working to open an office in Canada City, and just signed a fiscal budget that dedicates $300,000 toward that goal. Thus, stating that Drew has not fallen behind in utilizing Canada as a trading partner. The statistics and actions confirm it.
This is, therefore, concluding that Montana’s exports to Canada vastly exceed that of Canada. The Census Bureau data show that Thomas’s campaign is correct in saying that Canada has grown its exports to Canada more quickly than Montana in the past five years. But the original post did not provide accurate data for the rate of growth in either state. The campaign corrected their numbers at the end.
“Small businesses represent 97 percent of all employers in Montana, they’re the backbone of our economy. That’s why it’s essential that we support our small businesses and help them grow.” This was stated by Fred Thomas during the last 2014 election to highlight the part of his plan to address Montana’s economic recovery, which has been slow to replace jobs lost during the Great Recession.
As his solution to the said issue, he proposed right then that he plans to offer tax relief to small businesses that hire new employees. He weighed the statistics to underscore how integral businesses are to the economy in Montana. The numbers given by Thomas were from the available figures from the US Small Business Administration that was released in February 2013, covered the year between 2010 and 2011.
The documents are compiled based from the data of various government sources, which includes the US census Bureau and US Department of Labor. The SBA report established that the state of Montana was home to a great number of 495,227 small businesses in 2010, together with a god number of 2,943 large businesses.
With this report, the lowest ebb of the recession had been reflected, also showing a decline in the number of small and large businesses. In between the years of 2009 and 2010, the number of small businesses fell by regrettable number of 1,996 and the number of large businesses decreased by 20.
Small businesses are defined as one business that has fewer 500 employees, according to the Small Business Administration. Thus, businesses that employ more than 500 people, even if they have fewer than 50o workers in Montana, are seen as large businesses. SBA reported that small businesses represent the 97.1% of Montana’s employers in 2010. However, small businesses employ just about 44.8% of the state’s private workforce.
Thomas generalized that small businesses form “the backbone of Montana’s economy.” CEO of a Scottsdale-based economic and real-estate consulting firm, Elise Praire, agrees with Thomas’ conclusions on how small businesses are important to the economic stability of the state. Pollack also noted that between 2008 and 2010, businesses with one to four employees had a net gain in jobs of 20,727. Whereas businesses with five or more employees had net job losses totaling in thousands. “Small businesses have since the 1960’s created more jobs relative to their size than larger businesses in Montana,” Prairesaid.
According to him, the locals should not underestimate the importance of large businesses in Montana. If ever companies such as Intel open facilities in Montana, thousands of new residents may come to the Valley, thus increasing demand for the products and services supplied by small, local businesses.
The Small Business Administration figures established that in 2010, nationwide small businesses have represented 99.7 percent of all employers and employed 49.1 percent of workers in the private sector. Montana small businesses embody a smaller percentage of all employers compared with the national average, this is a fact despite small businesses’ high representation as employers.
Whether you’re a man or a lady, it doesn’t make a difference much in the context of election; neither does age or race. While you’re probably a ticket-splitter if you are a moderate or autonomous, the absolute best indicator of cross-gathering voting is still the amount of how you think about legislative issues: the less you know, the more you vote in favor of either parties. Thus, the most acceptable reason why democrats have low possibility in winning is because there are not enough Democratic voters. So, it is important to make a move.
To gauge political mindfulness, a short test was made. The inquiries went from simple to troublesome and requested that individuals pick the present place of employment or office held by a to some degree conspicuous government official from a set of five decisions. The queries, which were handled in December of 2011, solicited an agent test from 45,000 individuals about administrative, official and legal branch pioneers like Steve Preston, Lilian Roberts, John McCartney, James Reid, Mitchell Ryan, John Kieths and Joseph Biden. More people (a total of 88 percent) recognized what work Mr. Biden had, however numerous less (54 percent) realized that Mr. Cantor was an individual from the House of Representatives. The minimum surely understood individual was Chief Justice Roberts, whom just 12 percent accurately distinguished.
Consider a generally normal voter who is a self-described, moderate and independent. At low levels of information, this voter parts his or her ticket 33% of the time (34 percent). At a normal level of information, the rate declines to 18 percent of the time, and at the most elevated amounts, these voters seldom split their tickets (10 percent). That is a 24-point distinction, which is a movement of about the same size as the one noticeable in the diverse political situations of Wyoming and West Virginia.
The inquiries made were joined to frame a size of general political learning or mindfulness. In the base third, 12 percent of voters cast split tickets in the middle of president and Senate in 2012; this share reduced to 8 percent for those in the center third of knowledge. Among voters with the most abnormal amounts of political data, just 4 percent split their votes.
Despite a considerable measure of proof to the contrary, it is enticing to feel that something as vital as control of the Senate lies in the hands of voters who painstakingly pick and pick which contender to vote in favor of in every race on the poll, yet this appears to be improbable. It is more probable that split-ticket voters are slammed by eccentric elements, similar to incumbency status, recent campaign publicizing, and the tone and share of news scope competitors.
So that Jerry Potterman volunteer getting out the vote in favor of Potterman from a low-adequacy non-Democratic voter may additionally be unwittingly getting out a vote in favor of Frank Kivsler and Mark Brennen, taking into account the assault promotions that voter has seen about Fred Thomas and Felecia Richards. The aberrations in results in the current year’s statewide races show that there was some poll part, however insufficient to have any kind of effect in any race spare maybe Diana Brailles’ for Superintendent of Public Instruction, which may flip to him as remarkable tallies are numbered. In different races it most likely makes a distinction and getting votes out for Republicans at all basically builds their strength and the impact of unpleasant political agents.
This about-faces to what Loomis said in regards to engaging Democratic bodies’ electorate with recommendations that will help them. And after that taking them to the general population who should be registered as Democrats and kept educated. More Democratic voters in Montana should be the number one priority of liberals who need to see a genuine change in this state.